Budgeting Process Methods: Top-Down, Bottom-Up, Zero-Based Budgeting

Bottom-up budgeting is often preferred in organizations where departments have distinct operations and require more autonomy in budgeting decisions. It can also be beneficial in organizations that value detailed input from Cash Flow Statement all levels of staff. Ultimately, the best budgeting approach depends on the organization’s size, culture, structure, and specific operational needs. The bottom-up budgeting process allows employees to own the process since they are familiar with the expenditures at the departmental levels. They will also be motivated to work hard since they feel that their input in the organization is valued by the management.

Top-Down and Bottom-up Approach in Budgeting
Department heads interpret these objectives within the context of their own teams, considering what needs to be accomplished in unearned revenue terms of project completions, sales volumes, or innovation initiatives. Adapting the budgeting process to meet organizational needs is a dynamic and ongoing task. Every organization has unique characteristics and requirements that should be reflected in its budgeting approach. The impact of choosing between bottom up and top down budgeting is significant on the overall budgeting process.

Bottom-up vs. top-down budgeting: Which is best for your company?
- Once approved, Finance combines each proposal into a single, organization-wide budget.
- Each department is responsible for determining their goals and strategies for the year, and then working out what they would need in order to achieve this.
- Some companies might begin with an Excel spreadsheet and create a budget without a lot of involvement from the other parts of the organization.
- Bottom-up forecasting takes a more detailed approach by gathering data from smaller segments, like customers, sales reps, and suppliers.
Because of the uncertainty, the agency pricing was significantly buffered, to cover unseen contingencies in each job. When you then added these up, the additive effect became a multiplier effect adding to the overall cost. From the perspective of a CEO, strategic goals are a declaration of intent, a commitment to stakeholders that the company is striving for growth, efficiency, or perhaps sustainability. For a CFO, these goals translate into financial targets, such as revenue milestones, cost reduction percentages, or investment returns.
Five tips for a successful budget process!
However, management may or may not incorporate this input into the budgeting process. Each department is then tasked with allocating the designated amount to meet its specific needs. Often, corporate-level funds are reserved to accommodate final adjustments or additional resource requests if departments lack the necessary resources to achieve their individual goals. The duration of each budgeting process can vary depending on the size and complexity of the organization.

Key characteristics of bottom-up budgeting include its initiation at the departmental level, a focus on detailed input from lower management, and an emphasis on accuracy and accountability. This method ensures that the budget reflects the actual needs and priorities of each department. In my case, I had to partner with the new incoming Chief Marketing Officer to go over his budget and help him through the bottom-up approach. It took a lot longer and more meetings than the year prior, but we got a lot more detail into what his group wanted to work on and prioritizations. I got a better understanding of his entire organization, and it helped me have a better partnering relationship going forward. Ultimately, it came down to the need, justification from the budget stakeholders and the leadership’s decision making of what is best for the company.
Therefore, each department needs to set objectives based on its strategic and tactical planning. Executives will appreciate that bottom-up budgeting leads to more accurate estimates throughout the organization. The employees, after all, are the ones who understand the cost of what they do and the items involved in that work. Executives still have the final word on the budget so they can have a centralized strategy.
- It serves as a roadmap, guiding businesses through their fiscal period with detailed financial projections and action plans.
- Bottom-up budgeting takes more time since it requires many departments in the organization to offer insights, making it one of the more time-consuming bottom up budgeting approaches.
- That is that the agency would say that the budget for a television commercial (or campaign) would be between $1 million and $1.5 million if it was a top selling model or a more niche model.
- Get practical, strategic finance insights from those who’ve been there—straight to your inbox.
- But when markets shift fast, a rigid budget can create more problems than it solves.
- It is here that the overarching objectives are defined, reflecting the company’s vision and long-term aspirations.
Lack of detailed data renders it ineffective for strategic planning, leading them to opt for top-down budgeting, which requires less detail. Rolling forecasts differ from top-down and bottom-up approaches because they are not time-static. In rolling forecasts, the organization changes quickly in response to the changes in the market and business conditions. Activity-based top-down vs bottom-up budgeting budgeting focuses on the cost of the specific activities needed to deliver a product or service. Budgeting amounts are directly tied to the activities driving cost, better reflecting how resources are used.








